Wine Writers Symposium 2011: the audience part

As you may have figured out from the most recent post, the Symposium for Professional Wine Writers was about writing. But what’s writing without readers except a solitary exercise in frustration? The Negress prefers solitary exercises that relieve frustration preferably without involving a Sawzall (All right, she digresses. But that happened close to home.)  Alder Yarrow of Vinography, Doug Cook, formerly of Twitter and currently overseeing AbleGrape, a wine search engine and Joe Roberts of 1winedude, did a panel on using search engines. You may have noticed the

Doug Cook, founder of Able Grape search engine

Doug Cook of Able Grape

somewhat orderly titles here in Negressland of late. They are due in part to what this trio told us about how people search for information online. There are 131 billion searches performed online annually and that figure is increasingly by 46 percent every year. All of our panelists suggested when writing blog posts to put yourself in the searcher’s shoes. Search engines already do that and Google and its ilk have tons of people tweaking search algorithms so they behave more like humans. Of course, repeating “Lady Gaga” or “Justin Bieber” over and over in posts seems like a strategy, but guess what? The search engines are onto you and will banish you from search results for such obvious gaming of the system. One myth for web presences is that more traffic is better. What your goal should be is to connect with people who are interested in what you have to say and nobody else. You want

Joe Roberts of  the 1winedude blog

Joe Roberts of 1winedude (pic courtesy of NY Cork Report)

to maximize meaningful interactions. Tag your posts (the Negress does that). Encourage comments (please feel free but no spam. She has an app for that.) Also, limit your blogroll. Yarrow related that he was kicked out of search results because he had a page of links to other wine bloggers. Most search engines see this as a shameless ploy for traffic and will ban you very quickly. Vinography got reinstated to searches but it took some work.

Also, while search engines like repetition, remember readers are drawn to good writing. You may move up in the ranks by repeating “Trimbach Alsace Riesling” 12 times in a 500-word post, but your readers will flee clutching their heads. The Negress admits she knew a bit more about this than some of the Symposium attendees, but she was grateful to the trio for pulling it all together in a coherent fashion. You might have been over your head if to you a computer is just a typewriter with annoyances and think MS-DOS and xywrite are still viable, but let’s hope that’s a decreasing minority in the wine blogging world, Cook has posted the Power Point. Take look for yourself.

Symposium for Professional Wine Writers: the good and the bad

The Apple gang at SPWW

Wine writers writing.

The Symposium for Professional Wine Writers is three and a half days of full immersion in wine and writing for better or worse. It’s not a baptism exactly, but it can change your outlook in the same way that an oyster’s irritation can make a pearl.

In my case, the irritation makes for opinions. I left this, my third year in attendance, with some serious qualms about part of what we did. I also left with about 14 bottles of wine (no longer fit for carrying on so they were shipped back), a slightly sore foot and some deep convictions deepened. The event is put on by Meadowood, the Napa Valley Vintners and CIA Greystone.

I assume most of you reading this weren’t there so I’m going to put the trash talking up front. For one, the session on ethics was something of a clusterfuck. Most legacy media (newspapers and magazines) draw a bright line between making money and telling stories, but we lowly wine bloggers wear all the hats so it’s harder to make those firm delineations.  Some bloggers accept samples (I don’t). Some bloggers take junkets (I don’t). A few writers cross back and forth between working for wineries and writing about wine, which in any other line of journalistic endeavor would be fatal (I work for a Maryland winery Boordy Vineyards, pouring their wines at tastings but consider this fully disclosed right now).

But, remember, we said “wine writing,” not “wine journalism.” Bruce Schoenfeld said the best thing about a wine writer’s role, which is that we shouldn’t be concerned with the success or failure of the wine industry. Schoenfeld is the wine editor for Travel and Leisure. It is to be hoped that this discussion is retired after this year. By the way, 16 of the writers in attendance had their symposium expenses paid by a winery, although the fellowships came with no obligation to write. Also, the panelists attended dinners at the Dining Room at Meadowood and Greystone, which some attendees resented for the exclusivity and perk like nature.

Also irritating was the panel on “Maximizing and Monetizing your New Media Wine Writing.” First of all, I think them term “new media” should be retired since online and multimedia writing isn’t exactly new. As for monetizing your online writing, good luck unless you’re willing to embrace the 168-hour work week and leave the life you need to live to write about anything intelligently in a shambles in the background. Also, Alder Yarrow of Vinography (self-described as a “highly regarded wine blog”) cited Gary Vaynerchuk as an example of this maximizing and monetizing thing (Yarrow explains his position in a comment below). In the session, I pointed out with less vehemence than I felt that Vaynerchuk, love him or loathe him, is a retailer first and foremost. His Wine Library TV vlog only features wines his store sells, and his expansion of his brand identity into books, television and motivational speaking is supported by his retail empire and the staff that keeps it running while he incessantly tweets and Ustreams. It’s worth noting that Yarrow’s blog brings in about $2,500 a month, but he also has a full-time job to support his wife and daughter in San Francisco. Steve Heimoff, California editor of Wine Enthusiast, noted that $2,500 was not enough to support most people in a major city. You can’t cellar wine properly in a refrigerator box.

Probably the biggest hoot of the symposium was the panel on Luxury Media. Here we learned that Haute Living, available in four markets at this point, pays its writers 50 cents a word, which doesn’t sound very haute to me. Departures (you get this if you have an Amex Platinum card) and Worth (you only get this if you pay $20 per issue on the newsstand or are rich enough to receive it) paid more than that, but the scale only went up after you had a track record with each publication.

Lastly on the Symposium hatoration front, two quick takes: Christian Miller of Full Glass Research did a PowerPoint presentation on “What Wine Drinkers Are Reading.” The data he presented lacked some basic information for any polling or statistical research such as sample size and margin for error. I also like to see sample questions since some questions suggest answers. Perhaps that can be included if they do this again.

Also, there was a session on “Blogs and Books.” This could have been more accurately titled “How to Catch Lightning in a Beer Bottle for Fun and Profit.” I love Molly Wizenberg to death, but her experience with her Orangette blog isn’t going to happen to the millions of food and wine bloggers wandering the electronic countryside.

Now for the good stuff. Louise Kiernan of the Chicago Tribune and Antonia Allegra, who founded the symposium, led a pair of useful writing exercises about a sense of place and writing about wine and food, respectively. Eric Asimov reiterated his belief that drinking, not tasting, is the way to go. He finds tasting notes tyrannical. Jeff Morgan’s session on ‘What Wine Writers Need to Know about Winemaking” could have been twice as long, and his discussion of reverse osmosis and watering back to reduce alcohol was enlightening. Morgan said he might give the second half of the talk next year, and it would be worth coming back for.

Also, Chris Howell of Cain Vineyards led a discussion with Gilles de Chambure of Meadowood on Bordeaux varietals that are blended into his Cain Five wine. With illustrations of grape placement on the property and the ability to taste samples of each varietal in the Cain Five, it was lovely to see how, as one attendee put it, “two and two can add up to five.”

My favorite session was led by Mark Krasnow on detecting wine flaws such as cork taint, brett and methoxypyrazine. Krasnow had adulterated a basic box Merlot with the flaws so we could smell them (we couldn’t taste since Krasnow pointed out he used industrial chemicals to doctor the wine and it wasn’t safe to drink). He also pointed out that some of the chemicals could add a character to wines so perhaps they may not always be flaws.

We also got to eat at the Culinary Institute of America Greystone. During one of those meals, Vic Motto of Global Wine Partners, laid out the statistics of consolidation of winery ownerships and distributors. The take home from his talk was that smaller wineries might not weather this downturn unless direct to consumer shipping becomes the norm since the remaining distributors can’t work with every winery.

Since we were staying at Meadowood, we also got to enjoy some wines from members of the Napa Valley Vintners Association. A hearty raise of the glass to them for opening the vaults. Among the highlights were a 1987 Spring Mountain Cabernet Sauvignon along with older vintages from Trefethen and other landmark producers. I always hold out for the dessert wines. My favorite was the Frogenbeerenauslese from Frog’s Leap, which was nectar like and nearly made me moan aloud. The nightly postprandial tastings did renew my exuberance at finding a delightful wine and wanting to tell people about it, which may be the best thing the Symposium does every year.